Project properties |
|
Title | Determining effects of counting methodology on phytoplankton diversity indicators |
Group | Marine Animal Ecology |
Project type | thesis |
Credits | 24-39 |
Supervisor(s) | Dr. Katja Philippart
Léon Serre-Fredj Dr. Myron Peck |
Examiner(s) | Tinka Murk, Reindert Nijland, Ronald Osinga, Rosa van der Ven, Diede Maas |
Contact info | Diede Maas (diede.maas@wur.nl) for an information leaflet
Myron Peck (myron.peck@nioz.nl) |
Begin date | 2023/11/15 |
End date | 2024/11/15 |
Description | The Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research (NIOZ) located in Texel has at its disposal a
marine environmental time series that started as early as 1861 and is maintained until nowadays in the Wadden Sea (Philippart et al., 2010). This includes a long-term time series of phytoplankton cell measurements of 48 years (Jacobs et al., 2020). These measurements allow the calculation of diversity-specific indicators (Chiarucci et al., 2011) giving information on the evolution of biodiversity supporting decisions in environment management and allowing a better understanding of the marine ecosystem. These diversity indicators differ in calculation and emphasize different aspects of diversity (e.g. rare species or common species). As the importance of the biodiversity issue is rising (Henson et al., 2021), the robustness of the method that allows the calculation of the index should be assessed. The Utermöhl method is the most common technique used for counting phytoplankton species, usually a partial count is done to save time inducing a risk of miscounting the phytoplankton community. Assessing the potential error induced by the method would allow us to characterize better the robustness of the method to calculate the diversity indicator. Following this assessment, studying the variation of these different parameters through time using a 50-year times series in order will allow us to better understand how diversity should be interpreted and how it evolved in the last decade. The result will allow us to better choose an indicator fitting to a problematic or a specific dataset while being critical when using it. |
Used skills | |
Requirements |